Why Home Birth

Cascade of Intervention

The cascade of intervention refers to the likelihood of one medical intervention leading to the need for more interventions. Many women are unaware of the unintended effects of interventions when they accept an initial intervention during labour and birth. Often these unplanned and possibly unwanted effects are “solved” with further intervention, which may in turn create even more problems and the increased chances of further interventions. When these effects happen, women may feel that their bodies have failed them, not realizing that the things that went wrong could have actually been triggered by maternity practices themselves. Remember to apply the B.R.A.I.N acronym and weigh up the benefit, risks and alternative options.

By interventions, we are referring to many common and routine medical pregnancy and birth interventions, beginning with testing, working up to induction, fetal monitoring, pain medications and epidurals, assisted births (such as forceps and ventouse and episiotomy) to Caesarean Section operations. Many antenatal tests have high rates of false positives which can lead to additional testing and monitoring and often recommended induction. For this reason, it is suggested that antenatal tests and interventions are carefully researched and considered, so you can make an informed decision and decide to consent or decline.

Common maternity practices that can lead to a cascade of interventions include:

  • Unnecessary growth scans.
  • Induction of labour.
  • Using synthetic oxytocin, to make contractions stronger.
  • Using medications for pain relief.
  • Labouring in bed versus being upright and moving about.

These practices often cause problems because they disrupt the normal physiology of pregnancy, labour and birth by:

  • Interfering with labour and birth hormones.
  • Triggering fetal distress.
  • Prolonged second stage.

Leaving home during labour is one of the first interventions that disrupt the flow of birthing hormones. When in a hospital setting there are more disruptions and medical interventions. Caesarean section is major abdominal surgery yet despite this, the incidence is on the rise. The morbidities associated with caesarean section make this birthing experience less than pleasant. The associated short – medium-term risks could have lasting adverse effects on the health of the mother and baby. These include: 

  • Future fertility problems
  • Increase chance of low-lying placenta in subsequent pregnancies
  • Breastfeeding problems following the birth
  • Postnatal depression
  • Long recovery
  • Pain during recovery
  • Infection
  • Thrombosis
  • Adhesions, leading to bowel or fertility problems
  • Hysterectomy
  • Increased chance of a caesarean section for subsequent births.

The below flow diagram illustrates some of the potential impacts of unnecessary intervention.

Cascade of Interventions Diagram

Consider these snippets from scholarly research:

  • An epidural increases your chance of a caesarean by 160% (http://www.sarahbuckley.com/epidurals-risks-and-concerns-for-mother-and-baby/)
    Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications studied (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00214.x/full)

    • We can infer that a significant proportion of interventions were unnecessary or only marginally beneficial and continued increases in rates of obstetrical intervention are unlikely to result in improvements in birth outcomes overall and may pose a risk to mothers and their newborns. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00600.x/abstract)

      • Midwives working in maternity units that had a higher level of intervention generally perceived intrapartum risks to be higher than midwives working in lower intervention units. However, midwives generally underestimated the ability of women to progress normally and overestimated the advantages of technological interventions, in particular epidural analgesia. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613803000548)

        • Continuity of midwifery care is associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care. No statistically significant differences were observed in maternal and infant outcomes.
          (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09969.x/full)

          • One-to-One midwifery practice can provide a high degree of continuity of carer, and is associated with a reduction in the rate of a number of interventions, without compromising the safety of care. It should be extended locally and replicated in other services under continuing evaluation.(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10528949/)

          Home Birth

          Community Groups

          Here at Home Birth Aotearoa Trust, we find it very important to connect expectant mothers who are interested in home birthing to home birth community groups so that they can connect with other home birth whānau to gain support and information surrounding natural home births.